2008年09月18日
New York
I am writing this to you for the public opinion poll of the reader posted in an online version of the your magazine recently. In the section "Other side", vote 570 asks the following:
In the controversy with the Queens park, New York dog's world barks. Should I limit the time of the park of an off leash in the entire town?
a｡ Yes, it is necessary to always leash the dog in the city park.
b｡ No, it is important that the dog have spreading some time.
An overwhelming number of respondents (81%) chose "b". "No, it is important that the dog have spreading some time. "
I oppose it about the vote and you of the manipulation of the result as a trial. First of all, neither the lawsuit nor the proposer to execute the leash law of a healthy code said that they had opposed the dog run. In fact, the opposite is true. From enclosed dog run controversy is whether dog should be able to drive out those leashes in non-enclosed public space The advocacy group such as "New York City dog" doesn't want to become the good neighbors, and they want their pets, and it defecates anywhere, it wants them, and it wants the right wanting it to always allow it to race with the city park and urination. These people do not want the responsibility of maintaining the dog run well. (It is a community dog run that the city needs. )｡ Instead, to repair any damage that the untied dog causes to our park, park patron, and other dogs, the resident of the payment of taxes of the New York city of us begins to take the responsibility.
There is assumption of the question of you that only one choices from the leash to the allowance of the dog are in the park. How about an enclosed dog run?The vote seems to have been made by the off leash supporter who had used the magazine to promote the person's cause for people who were closely investigating this problem. In addition, for all of dog owner's forum and Web site to give the link to the web page "Other side", and to apply the sign of the collation of answer "b", it urged it on those elements. As for your public opinion poll, your readership is very scientific or to give an accurate opinion, barely designed.
You might have written the question that drew out an unbiased result little of
creativity and honesty. For instance:
a｡ Yes,, Dog..enclose..dog run..untie.
b｡ No, the dog should be able to run about the city park as those leashes do
not exist.
The your magazine took a completely legitimate question that the answer had been weighted so that that time might misinterpret the result. Externals are that you do even though it influences the process of the decision making of the city. Do you really believe the idea really when you can allow the majority of New Yorker Public domain and "Spread" the dog completely?I seriously doubt it.
In the controversy with the Queens park, New York dog's world barks. Should I limit the time of the park of an off leash in the entire town?
a｡ Yes, it is necessary to always leash the dog in the city park.
b｡ No, it is important that the dog have spreading some time.
An overwhelming number of respondents (81%) chose "b". "No, it is important that the dog have spreading some time. "
I oppose it about the vote and you of the manipulation of the result as a trial. First of all, neither the lawsuit nor the proposer to execute the leash law of a healthy code said that they had opposed the dog run. In fact, the opposite is true. From enclosed dog run controversy is whether dog should be able to drive out those leashes in non-enclosed public space The advocacy group such as "New York City dog" doesn't want to become the good neighbors, and they want their pets, and it defecates anywhere, it wants them, and it wants the right wanting it to always allow it to race with the city park and urination. These people do not want the responsibility of maintaining the dog run well. (It is a community dog run that the city needs. )｡ Instead, to repair any damage that the untied dog causes to our park, park patron, and other dogs, the resident of the payment of taxes of the New York city of us begins to take the responsibility.
There is assumption of the question of you that only one choices from the leash to the allowance of the dog are in the park. How about an enclosed dog run?The vote seems to have been made by the off leash supporter who had used the magazine to promote the person's cause for people who were closely investigating this problem. In addition, for all of dog owner's forum and Web site to give the link to the web page "Other side", and to apply the sign of the collation of answer "b", it urged it on those elements. As for your public opinion poll, your readership is very scientific or to give an accurate opinion, barely designed.
You might have written the question that drew out an unbiased result little of
creativity and honesty. For instance:
a｡ Yes,, Dog..enclose..dog run..untie.
b｡ No, the dog should be able to run about the city park as those leashes do
not exist.
The your magazine took a completely legitimate question that the answer had been weighted so that that time might misinterpret the result. Externals are that you do even though it influences the process of the decision making of the city. Do you really believe the idea really when you can allow the majority of New Yorker Public domain and "Spread" the dog completely?I seriously doubt it.
Posted by ccwhqi1 at
14:41
